Back to work
Banking · Risk · Wells Fargo

Credit Risk 360

How a $12.8B commercial lending book cut modeled default exposure 31% in one year.

An enterprise credit-risk platform that gives lending teams real-time portfolio sensing — with a GenAI layer that turns live risk data into plain-language narratives and explainable, auditable recommendations.

Role: Product Design LeadYear: 2025Sector: Commercial Banking
Credit Risk 360 enterprise dashboard showing portfolio risk score, default probability trends, and cohort risk analytics
-31%
Modeled default exposure
2.1×
Faster review cycles
+38%
Analyst adoption
$12.8B
Portfolio under coverage

Explore the live dashboard

A working slice of the product. Switch the time range to watch the trend, sector cohorts, and the AI agent assistant respond in real time.

Credit Risk 360 · Live Demo

Total Portfolio · as of May 2025

Portfolio EAD
$12.84B
+5.7% vs prior
Expected Loss (1Y)
$128.7M
+7.3% vs prior
Weighted Avg PD
2.37%
+0.28pp vs prior
Portfolio Risk Score
72
+6 pts vs prior

Default Probability Trend

1Y · weighted PD

PD by Sector Cohort

1Y PD %
Case study summary

From challenge to outcome

1

The Problem

No live tracking. A $12.8B commercial book was read through spreadsheets and overnight batches, so deterioration surfaced only after accounts had already slipped and every intervention was a post-mortem.
2

What We Learned

Credit officers reason in cohorts and trajectories, not static scores. A snapshot answers the wrong question precisely — they needed movement over time, sourced from data they could trust.
3

The Strategy

Replace the snapshot with live trend graphs drawn straight from the risk ledger — authentic, traceable data — and put an AI agent beside them to explain what is moving and what to do next.
4

How It Was Built

Semantic risk tokens, a reusable analytics-card primitive and one charting language. The grounded agent (RAG over risk documents plus a multi-agent workflow) links every claim to a visible figure and logs each accept or dismiss.
5

Accessibility

Rebuilt to WCAG AA on dense risk data: colour never carries meaning alone, charts expose text summaries, the agent chat is fully keyboard-operable, and focus order and labels were corrected end to end.
6

The Impact

Modeled default exposure −31%, review cycles 2.1× faster, analyst adoption +38%. The decision log gave the regulator real early-warning evidence.
7

What I Carry Forward

Match the interface to the expert's mental model and adoption needs no training programme. AI earns trust only when every claim is grounded, reversible and reachable by keyboard.

Structure, flow & fidelity

How the product was organised, the path a user actually takes through it, and how the work travelled from scratch wireframes to a working prototype.

Information architecture

Portfolio overview

  • Risk KPIs
  • PD trend
  • Sector cohorts
  • AI agent assistant

Alerts

  • Early-warning queue
  • Severity & band
  • Assignment
  • Snooze / escalate

Cohort & account

  • Cohort drill-down
  • Vintage migration
  • Account timeline
  • Exposure detail

Decisions

  • Recommended action
  • Accept / dismiss / annotate
  • Decision log
  • Audit export

User flow of the core task

  1. Step 01

    Scan portfolio

    Officer opens the portfolio view and reads risk direction, not a static score.

  2. Step 02

    Open an alert

    A flagged cohort opens with the figures that triggered it already in context.

  3. Step 03

    Drill to cohort

    Vintage migration and PD distribution explain who is moving and why.

  4. Step 04

    Ask the agent

    The grounded AI agent proposes a ranked action, each claim linked to a figure.

  5. Step 05

    Log the decision

    Accept, dismiss or annotate — written to an auditable decision log.

Behind the work

My scope, the guardrails I worked inside, what the research changed, and how the work travelled from sketch to production.

My role & scope

Design lead, end-to-end: discovery workshops with credit officers, information architecture, the alert-to-decision flow, the risk-narrative interface, and the semantic risk tokens shipped into the platform design system. Worked with 4 engineers, a risk PM, and a model-risk reviewer over 9 months.

Constraints & guardrails

  • Model-risk governance: every AI statement had to be traceable to a visible figure before it could ship.
  • Legacy batch pipeline — portfolio state refreshed overnight, so the UI had to communicate data age honestly.
  • Bank design standards and WCAG AA contrast on dense, colour-coded risk data.
  • No net-new training for 300+ officers; the interface had to be learnable in one sitting.

What research changed

  • Shadowing 14 credit officers showed they reason in cohorts and trajectories, never single-account scores.
  • Analytics showed 62% of alert clicks ended with no logged action — the alert carried no context to act on.
  • Usability testing on the first build: 5 of 8 officers could not explain where a score came from.

The pivot

The first direction was a scored watchlist ranked by PD. It tested badly — officers distrusted a number they could not decompose. We rebuilt around trajectory: alert opens a cohort, cohort opens an account timeline, and every AI claim links back to the figure behind it.

UX metric → business impact

Time-to-decision on an alert fell from ~22 min to ~9 min
Review cycles ran 2.1× faster, letting the same team cover the full $12.8B book without headcount.
Logged-action rate on alerts rose from 38% to 81%
Earlier intervention cut modeled default exposure 31%.
Weekly analyst adoption +38%
The decision log became defensible early-warning evidence for the regulator.
1Lo-fi

Whiteboard alert-to-decision maps and paper cohort flows tested with officers before any UI existed.

2Mid-fi

Clickable prototype of the cohort drill-down plus annotated states for empty, stale and low-confidence AI output.

3Production

Live dashboard with semantic risk tokens, gradient trend charts, sector heatmaps, and the grounded narrative panel.

Retrospective

With more time

Instrument the decision log from day one instead of month four — we lost early baseline data that would have made the exposure claim tighter.

Biggest takeaway

In regulated enterprise work, explainability is the adoption strategy. Officers accept AI guidance only when they can decompose it, and stakeholder alignment gets easier the moment every claim points at a number.

“We stopped finding out about deterioration at month-end. The narrative tells us which cohorts are moving and why, and we can defend every call to the regulator.”
— Head of Portfolio Risk, Fortune 50 US bank (name withheld under NDA)